Book Editing AI Prompt: Developmental and Line Editing Prompt for 70K-Word UX and AI Design Book

Instructions: Copy this prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or your favorite AI assistant. Include a copy of your book, then let it do the editing magic!

Prompt:

Structural Assessment

  • Evaluate the narrative arc across chapters

  • Identify structural weaknesses (repetition, gaps in logic, underdeveloped concepts)

  • Assess chapter organization and transitions

  • Verify content hierarchy matches the reader journey

  • Check that the introduction establishes clear expectations and the conclusion delivers on promises

Content Quality

  • Assess the depth and originality of ideas

  • Verify technical accuracy and currency of UX/AI concepts

  • Evaluate practical applications and case studies

  • Ensure complex ideas are explained clearly for the intended audience

  • Verify all stories, anecdotes, and examples are authentic and properly attributed

Writing Style

  • Maintain a consistent professional tone appropriate for UX/AI professionals

  • Check for clarity, conciseness, and precision

  • Ensure accessibility for the target audience

  • Eliminate jargon without sacrificing technical accuracy

  • Evaluate sentence variety and paragraph structure

Technical Accuracy

  • Fact-check all technical claims, methodologies, and frameworks

  • Verify the accuracy of historical information about UX and AI development

  • Ensure software references are current and accurate

  • Validate all statistical data and research findings

  • Cross-reference industry standards and best practices

Citation Needs

  • Flag all statements requiring academic or industry citations

  • Identify uncredited concepts, frameworks, or methodologies

  • Note instances where statistical claims lack sources

  • Mark unattributed quotes, anecdotes, or case studies

  • Identify areas where additional research is needed

Line Editing

  • Correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors

  • Improve word choice and eliminate redundancies

  • Refine awkward phrasing and convoluted sentences

  • Standardize terminology throughout the manuscript

  • Ensure consistent formatting of technical terms

Chapter-by-Chapter Analysis Framework

For each chapter, provide:

  1. Executive Summary

    • Key strengths

    • Critical weaknesses

    • Overall assessment

  2. Structural Analysis

    • Flow and organization

    • Chapter cohesion

    • Connection to the overall narrative

    • Balance of theory and practical examples

  3. Content Evaluation

    • Factual accuracy

    • Technical currency

    • Depth of coverage

    • Originality of insights

    • Practical applicability

  4. Citation Requirements

    • Specific statements requiring citation

    • Uncredited concepts

    • Statistical claims needing verification

    • Historical information requiring sources

    • Industry claims needing support

  5. Line Edit Comments

    • Identified errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling)

    • Awkward phrasing

    • Redundancies

    • Inconsistencies in terminology

    • Style and tone issues

  6. Visual Elements

    • Assessment of diagrams, charts, and graphics

    • Clarity and relevance of visual aids

    • Accuracy of captions and labels

    • Integration with the surrounding text

    • Recommendations for additional visuals

  7. Recommendations

    • Specific content to add

    • Content to remove or condense

    • Areas to develop further

    • Technical concepts needing clarification

    • Organizational improvements

Implementation Process

After receiving this feedback, please proceed as follows:

  1. Review the chapter-by-chapter analysis

  2. Prioritize critical issues affecting overall manuscript quality

  3. Address structural issues before line edits

  4. Verify all citations and factual claims

  5. Refine the manuscript for clarity, precision, and engagement

  6. Review for consistency across chapters after individual edits

This approach ensures your book will meet professional standards while maintaining your unique voice and expertise. The detailed feedback will highlight both strengths to preserve and weaknesses to address, resulting in a polished, authoritative manuscript ready for publication.

Previous
Previous

Adobe Firefly’s Bold Leap: Transforming UX Design Workflows with AI-driven Creativity

Next
Next

AI Won't Replace Designers, It Will Elevate Them: Insights Inspired by Dylan Field, CEO of Figma